Template-type: ReDif-Paper 1.0
Author-Name: Dietrich Franz 
Author-Name: List Christian 
Author-workplace-name: METEOR
Title: Propositionwise judgment aggregation
Abstract: In the theory of judgment aggregation, it is known for which agendas of propositions it is possible to aggregate individual judgments into collective ones in accordance with the Arrow-inspired requirements of universal domain, collective rationality, unanimity preservation, non-dictatorship and propositionwise independence. But it is only partially known for which agendas it is possible to respect additional requirements, notably non-oligarchy, anonymity, no individual veto power, or implication preservation. We fully characterize the agendas for which there are such possibilities, thereby answering the most salient open questions about propositionwise judgment aggregation. Our results build on earlier results by Nehring and Puppe (2002), Nehring (2006) and Dietrich and List (2007a).
Keywords: mathematical economics; 
Series: Research Memoranda
Creation-Date: 2009
Number: 020
File-URL: http://digitalarchive.maastrichtuniversity.nl/fedora/objects/guid:9d9a2bb9-c2e8-42ec-9d45-a0eea167b734/datastreams/ASSET1/content
File-Format: application/pdf
File-Size: 387788
Handle: RePEc:unm:umamet:2009020